In today's scientific economy, less than half of study outcomes are reported, and less than half of those can be replicated [1, 2]. We're not just facing a reproducibility crisis—we're facing an efficiency catastrophe. At ResearchHub, we are addressing this problem with a
ResearchHub pays you for peer reviewing preprints. If you don’t find a peer review grant that suits your expertise or identify a preprint you’d like to review, you can request a grant to be assigned. Follow these 5 steps to request a grant to review any preprint. Step
Launching in January 2025, the collaboration between ResearchHub and the Center for Open Science aims to accelerate scientific discovery by integrating ResearchHub's incentivized peer review system with the COS’ Lifecycle Journal. Our goal is to foster a more transparent and efficient publication model. The Lifecycle Journal is an
ResearchHub introduces open access paid peer review journal—ensuring transparency, reproducibility, and rapid completion in just 21 days.
Unveiling the Future of AI in Science: Scaling Up AI-Powered Error Detection. It all started with a 10-page paper and a math error that caused a stir in the scientific community. Out of curiosity, Twitter user Ethan Mollick (@emollick) wondered: could an AI spot the mistake with just a prompt
ResearchCoin (RSC) is a digital token that rewards high-quality scientific research. In technical terms, ResearchCoin is a digital asset built on the Ethereum blockchain–an ERC20 token. In our vision, it is a new digital asset for the global scientific community. Not only does it have value–it represents a
Every day, thousands of research papers hit the shelves, each vying for attention in an already overloaded system. Recent bibliometrics reveal that scientific publications have surged by 8-9% annually, for decades. In biomedicine alone, over a million papers flood the PubMed database each year—roughly two papers every minute (Nature,
Is science held back by funding? According to 270 scientists surveyed by Vox, the answer is a resounding yes. They see financial limitations as one of the biggest barriers to breakthroughs (Belluz et al., 2016). The quest to find funding for research in modern science is often riddled with obstacles.
Despite billions of dollars being poured into scientific research each year, much of it never sees the light of day. Groundbreaking discoveries often remain buried in academic journals, accessible only to a small circle of scientists. Meanwhile, the world outside the lab struggles to benefit from these advancements, and industries,
Academic publishing is a cornerstone of scientific progress, yet the traditional journal system is riddled with inefficiencies that slow down the dissemination of knowledge and impose significant costs on researchers.
On February 25, 2019, Brian Armstrong, co-founder and CEO of Coinbase, published a blog post outlining five significant challenges confronting the scientific community. Five years later, let us examine how ResearchHub has transformed the research landscape.
ResearchHub is introducing a novel reputation and reward algorithm designed to help fix academia's broken incentive structure by directly rewarding high-quality research and the scientists who create it. In this post, we will explain why this approach is sorely needed and how it will benefit scholars around the